cloning :: essays research papers

Cloning. It looks as if the variant of manipulating nature based on the supposition of multiplying tender-hearted beings is access within the reach of modern science quickly.Todays scientists have already been able to dead ringer a sheep. The living result is Dolly a normal ewe, unrecorded and kicking, shes just an exact copy of her celldonor. When more of less the same technique would be used on world, that would mean the solution of some problems.Infertile and dauntless couples could have a baby by having themselves cloned. Serious diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson could be cured by transplanting unaffected cells (donated by an fertilized egg that is a clone of the patient himself) into the brain. Donor organs would no longer have to come from outsiders, just now could be produced with stemcells (cells that carry the potency to develop into whatever part of the human body) from the copy of the patient. This process prevents the organ from being rejected by the patien ts body, because it is built out of the same tissue. So whats all the fuss approximately?In revisal to create a kidney for instance, first a complete fertilized egg (a clone of the patient) has to be produced in target to donate the kidney cells. After the embryo has fulfilled its task, it leave alone be aborted. But even producing the embryo by re-create already raises a lot of problems. If cloning is practiced on humans in order to provide children it will cause huge infant mortality. When cloned children grow up theyll probably have to face an identity crisis, because theyll exactly match one of their parents. another(prenominal) disadvantage of cloning is that it can easily be used for a lot of questionable aims, like in the book The Boys from Brazil. My opinion. I admit cloning human beings to grow spare organs is a very tempting idea. On the other hand aborting your own clone sounds awful. Im perfectly not against normal abortion, but in relation to cloning I feel its s omehow wrong.cloning essays research papers Cloning. It looks as if the variant of manipulating nature based on the idea of multiplying human beings is coming within the reach of modern science quickly.Todays scientists have already been able to clone a sheep. The living result is Dolly a normal ewe, alive and kicking, shes just an exact copy of her celldonor. When more of less the same technique would be used on humans, that would mean the solution of many problems.Infertile and gay couples could have a baby by having themselves cloned. Serious diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson could be cured by transplanting unaffected cells (donated by an embryo that is a clone of the patient himself) into the brain. Donor organs would no longer have to come from outsiders, but could be produced with stemcells (cells that carry the potency to develop into any part of the human body) from the copy of the patient. This process prevents the organ from being rejected by the patients body, beca use it is built out of the same tissue. So whats all the fuss about?In order to create a kidney for instance, first a complete embryo (a clone of the patient) has to be produced in order to donate the kidney cells. After the embryo has fulfilled its task, it will be aborted. But even producing the embryo by cloning already raises a lot of problems. If cloning is practiced on humans in order to provide children it will cause huge infant mortality. When cloned children grow up theyll probably have to face an identity crisis, because theyll exactly resemble one of their parents. Another disadvantage of cloning is that it can easily be used for a lot of questionable aims, like in the book The Boys from Brazil. My opinion. I admit cloning human beings to grow spare organs is a very tempting idea. On the other hand aborting your own clone sounds awful. Im absolutely not against normal abortion, but in relation to cloning I feel its somehow wrong.